Not every hedge fund should be built the same way. One of the earliest and most important formation decisions is whether the fund will rely on the 3(c)(1) or 3(c)(7) exemption under the Investment Company Act. That choice affects the investor base, the fundraising path, the subscription process, and, in many cases, the way the entire structure should be put together.
We advise sponsors on hedge fund formation for both 3(c)(1) and 3(c)(7) funds. In practice, that means helping clients make the right structural call at the outset and then turning that decision into a workable legal package:
For some managers, a 3(c)(1) fund is the better fit because it allows for a more limited and controlled investor base. For others, a 3(c)(7) structure makes more sense because it opens the door to qualified purchasers and a different capital-raising strategy.
We help clients think through that choice in practical terms, not abstract ones. The question is not just what is legally available. The question is which structure matches the manager’s business plan, target investors, economics, and growth plans.
Our hedge fund formation work typically includes:
We also advise on master-feeder structures, offshore funds, parallel vehicles, seed arrangements, founder terms, and the allocation of rights and economics among sponsors, principals, and early investors.
These early formation decisions matter because they tend to shape the fund for years to come. A structure may look fine on paper, but if it does not match how the manager actually plans to raise capital, bring in investors, and grow the platform, problems often show up later. We help clients think through those issues at the outset and put in place a structure that is practical, credible, and built to support the offering.
Kindly complete the form provided below
Download our FREE guide and take the
first step in building a successful business